Satoshi‘s game or the (true) idea behind Bitcoin.
In my opinion, Satoshi Nakamoto is / was a collective of liberatarian individuals.
Let me be a curious mind / child for a moment and just play with the Kanji characters 中本哲史. You could come to this conclusion
„Lessons learned in history and philosophy“
or broadly (and pure subjectively) speaking:
„Mankind‘s history and philosophy so far, and the conclusion that we found insight it“.
The status quo of the paper „Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System“ is the tremendious lack of trust in then system in 2008 (financial crisis). We individuals are at war and need protection of our freedoms and funds. It is also about arms race and balance and equal chances and …
They solution was: a decentralized system without intermediaries and the state and its governments bodies and its other shapes like financial institutions …
In they remarks, they pointed out to the fact that states / financial institutions / politicians will try to catch up. They will also finally do it, but:
„Yes, [Yes is the answer to the remark, that there will be a (final) solution to political problems in cryptography]
but we can win a major battle in the arms race and
gain a new territory of freedom for several years.
Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own.“
What do you think about this alternative and very subjective interpretation?